Call us toll-free

Quick academic help

Don't let the stress of school get you down! Have your essay written by a professional writer before the deadline arrives.

Calculate the price


275 Words


Hobbes finds that humans are in fact very closely related to nature.

This shift underlies Hobbes’s famous re-definition of natural law: “A Law of Nature is a precept or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life or which takes away the means of preserving the same. . . . For though they that speak of this subject used to confound jus and lex (right and law), yet they ought to be distinguished, because Right consists in liberty to do or forbear, whereas Law binds to one of them; so that law and right differ as much as obligation and liberty.” From the new definition of natural law as a right or liberty to preserve one’s self, Hobbes deduces nineteen commands, such as seek peace; lay down the right to all things and transfer power to a sovereign; obey the social contract; promote the attitudes conducive to civil peace (such as gratitude, forgiveness, avoidance of pride, treating people equally, and acceptance of arbitration and impartial judges). Hobbes acknowledges that these moral attitudes are social virtues, but they are aimed at the minimal good of civil peace rather than the perfection of mind and character; they also make obedience to positive law the primary duty of natural law, removing any pretext for rebellion in the name of higher law.

The realist school is based on the thought that human nature is not perfectible.

For this paper I will be arguing that, John Locke provides a more compelling framework of modern era liberalism because of his perception of the state of nature, the social contract and the function of government....

Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, 11.1–2.

In contrast, the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued against dualism in favor of materialism.

At any rate, Hobbes was very much interested in scientific explanationof the world: both its practice (which he saw himself as engaged in)and also its theory. Chapter 9 of Leviathan tells ussomething about the differences between scientific and historicalknowledge, and the divisions between sciences. Chapter 6 of DeCorpore gives a much fuller treatment of issues in the philosophyof science, issues of what Hobbes calls method. Method tells us how toinvestigate things in order to achieve scientia, the bestsort of knowledge.

This section tells a version of the first story. (For a helpful recentcritical discussion of such an approach, see Hattab 2014.) Still, oneshould note that Hobbes sometimes uses the language of mathematicalmethod, of analysis and synthesis, in describing his general method(Hobbes 1655, 6.1). Several commentators have seen this, together withhis clear admiration for the successes of geometry, as evidence of amore general use of mathematical notions in his account of method(Talaska 1988). And it might indeed be the case that both storiesabout Hobbes’s method (the Zabarellan and the mathematical) havesome truth to them.

These three principles are purely human nature Hobbes argues.

Speech, according to Hobbes, was invented in order to verbalize our thoughts.

Though the vast majority of work on Hobbes looks at his politicalphilosophy, there are general books on Hobbes that look at hisnon-political philosophy, such as Sorell 1986 and Martinich 2005. Thebest modern biography is Martinich 1999.

One important connection is that between Hobbes’s work andLeibniz’s. Of all the canonical philosophers in the period fromDescartes to Kant, Leibniz is probably the one who paid most attentionto Hobbes’s work, and had the most to say about differentaspects of it. Leibniz found Hobbes’s work worthy of seriousengagement, but ultimately also thought it mistaken in many ways. Onthe other hand, later empiricist philosophers, in particular Locke andHume, develop several Hobbesian themes. Indeed, one might well speakof Hobbes, not Locke, as the first of the British empiricists.

However, in Thomas Hobbes Leviathan we see a departure from this inequality.
Order now

    As soon as we have completed your work, it will be proofread and given a thorough scan for plagiarism.


    Our clients' personal information is kept confidential, so rest assured that no one will find out about our cooperation.


    We write everything from scratch. You'll be sure to receive a plagiarism-free paper every time you place an order.


    We will complete your paper on time, giving you total peace of mind with every assignment you entrust us with.


    Want something changed in your paper? Request as many revisions as you want until you're completely satisfied with the outcome.

  • 24/7 SUPPORT

    We're always here to help you solve any possible issue. Feel free to give us a call or write a message in chat.

Order now

An Analytical Summary Of Thomas Hobbes ..

The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best.

Hobbes Thomas Leviathan Essays]:: ..

This negative view of natural law can be traced to Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), whose writings are largely devoted to showing the anarchy and civil wars caused by appeals to natural and divine laws above the will of the sovereign. Hobbes rejected traditional higher law doctrines and encouraged people to accept the established laws and customs of their nations, even if they seemed oppressive, for the sake of civil peace and security. His critique has been a leading cause of the demise of natural law and the acceptance of positive law as the only reliable guide for political authority.

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan :: Leviathan Essays

One may be equally surprised to learn, however, that many people today embrace a different (and seemingly contradictory) view of natural law, and this too is traceable to Thomas Hobbes. For example, when conscientious people are confronted with violations of human rights—as in religious theocracies that violate women’s rights or in countries that allow sweatshops to trample on worker’s rights—they feel compelled to protest the injustice of those practices and to change them for the better. The protesters usually deny that they are following natural law, but they obviously are asserting a belief in universal moral truths that are grounded in human nature—in this case, the natural equality of human beings that underlies human rights. This understanding of higher law originates with Hobbes because he was largely responsible for transforming classical natural law into modern natural rights, thereby beginning the “human rights revolution” in thinking on natural law. How is it possible for Hobbes and his followers to embrace seemingly contradictory views of natural law, rejecting one form as intolerant, self-righteous, and anarchical, while embracing another form as the universal ideal of social justice? Let us turn to Hobbes for an answer to this puzzle, and, in so doing, uncover the sources of our modern conceptions of law, rights, and justice.

Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan as a testament on how to run a country

According to the classical view, man is a rational and social animal who has a natural inclination to his proper end, happiness, which can be attained by the virtues or the perfections of mind and character. Classical natural law was therefore “teleological”: directed to the natural end of human beings and to the good life of virtue in a just political community. Hobbes rejects the teleological view of human nature as a false and dangerous illusion. Instead, he sees human nature as the restless striving for power after power that has no end and therefore no happiness or perfection. The rejection of end-directed motion underlies Hobbes’s revolution in thinking from classical natural law, and its perfectionist principle of virtue, to modern natural rights, and its minimalist principle of self-preservation.

Thomas Hobbes' State of Nature in Leviathan Essay …

The mechanical model of man, however, is not sufficient to refute classical natural law. Hobbes develops a second argument based on moral experience, showing that human beings are motivated not only by pleasure and power but also by vanity—a false estimate of one’s superiority to others. In historical writings, Hobbes shows how the passion of vanity has undermined traditional political authority where kings have relied on higher law to gain obedience from the people. The defect of this arrangement is that traditional higher law doctrines are easily exploited by vain and ambitious men who claim superiority to the sovereign because of privileged knowledge of divine, natural, and common law. Hobbes’s account of the English Civil War (1642–60) in Behemoth illustrates the problem: King Charles I was overthrown by Puritan clergymen, democratic Parliamentarians, and lawyers of the common law who sought recognition for their superior knowledge of higher law, yet who could not agree among themselves about whose doctrine was right, producing sectarian wars that reduced English society to the anarchic state of nature. From this frightening analysis, however, Hobbes draws a hopeful lesson: if higher laws are not equated with intangible goods like virtue, wisdom, and salvation, then the ills of civilization can be avoided and mankind can enjoy enduring civil peace.

Order now
  • You submit your order instructions

  • We assign an appropriate expert

  • The expert takes care of your task

  • We send it to you upon completion

Order now
  • 37 684

    Delivered orders

  • 763

    Professional writers

  • 311

    Writers online

  • 4.8/5

    Average quality score

Order now
  • Kim

    "I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."

  • Paul

    "Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."

  • Ellen

    "Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."

  • Joyce

    "Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."

  • Albert

    "Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."

  • Mary

    "Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."

Ready to tackle your homework?

Place an order